Impact of Medicaid Eligibility Changes on Long-acting Reversible Contraception Use in Massachusetts and Maine.

BACKGROUND: Availability of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) is an important indicator of high-quality women's health care. There are limited data on the impact of state-level Medicaid eligibility changes on LARC use. STUDY DESIGN: We used All-Payers Claims Databases to examine LARC insertions among women enrolled in Medicaid in Massachusetts, which expanded Medicaid in 2014, and Maine, which restricted Medicaid eligibility in 2013. We used interrupted time series (ITS) analyses to determine the impact of Medicaid eligibility changes on level and trends in LARC insertions in these states. RESULTS: In Massachusetts, graphical evidence demonstrates that after Medicaid expansion, there was an immediate increase in mean monthly LARC insertions and insertions per 1000 enrollees. In ITS regression adjusting for age, LARC insertions per enrollee increased immediately after Medicaid expansion by 32% (P<0.001). After expansion, as the number of enrollees continued to rise, mean monthly LARC insertions rose, but there was a slightly decreasing trend in insertions per enrollee by 1% per month (P<0.001). In Maine, graphical evidence shows that initial reductions in Medicaid eligibility were associated with an immediate drop in LARC insertion numbers and rates per 1000, with ITS regression demonstrating an immediate 17% drop in insertions per enrollee (P<0.001). As Maine's Medicaid enrollment declined from 2013 to 2015, the number of LARC insertions remained flat, leading to an increasing trend in insertions per enrollee, similar to pre-2013 trends (P=0.17). CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid eligibility changes were associated with immediate changes in LARC uptake. Medicaid expansion may help ensure access to this effective contraceptive method.

Provision of long-acting reversible contraception at surgical abortion-A cross-sectional nationwide register study.

INTRODUCTION: Provision of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) at surgical abortion is safe, practical, and leads to higher user rates than does delayed provision. The aim of this study was to explore whether provision of LARC at surgical abortion is associated with known risk factors for subsequent abortions and inconsistent use of contraception, including sociodemographic factors and psychiatric disorders. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a register-based cross-sectional study of 6251 women having a surgical abortion in Sweden. Data were collected from National health and population registers. Women with procedure codes for surgical abortion were identified in the National Patient Register from October 2016 to December 2018. Information from Statistics Sweden, the National Patient Register, and the Swedish prescribed drug register on sociodemographic factors, psychiatric disorders, and dispensed LARC was added and linked on an individual level. Associations of sociodemographic factors and psychiatric disorders with LARC provision were explored with generalized logit mixed models and presented as crude and adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: The overall rate of LARC provision at the time of the abortion was 2515/6251 (40.2%). Younger age and lower level of education were associated with an increased likelihood of LARC provision. In the study population, 2624/6251 (42.0%) patients had a pre- or post-abortion psychiatric disorder, a factor associated with an increased likelihood of LARC provision compared with women with no such disorders (adjusted odds ratio 1.21; 95% CI 1.08-1.34). The highest rates and odds were seen among women with personality, substance use, and/or neurodevelopmental disorders and among women with multiple psychiatric disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Sociodemographic risk factors and psychiatric disorders were associated with increased LARC provision at surgical abortion, indicating that women at high risk of unwanted pregnancies are provided with effective contraception. Still, less than half of all women undergoing surgical abortion were provided with LARC, suggesting that contraceptive access and counseling prior to a surgical abortion can be improved.

Use of Immediate Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Before and After a State Policy Mandated Inpatient Access.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the rate of immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) use in a multihospital health care system 2 years before and after the policy was implemented, and to assess factors associated with LARC use and repeat pregnancy rates within 12 months after delivery. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients giving birth at three Cleveland Clinic Ohio hospitals from July 1, 2015, to June 30, 2019. We reviewed the inpatient medication reconciliation to identify the LARC initiation rate. We compared all patients who received inpatient postpartum LARC to a 1:3 matched sample of patients who did not receive LARC, matched by delivery date and location, to identify patient characteristics associated with LARC use. The electronic medical record (Epic) was reviewed to identify new pregnancies occurring within 12 months postdelivery. RESULTS: We identified 17,848 deliveries prepolicy and 18,555 deliveries postpolicy. Immediate postpartum LARC was used by 0.5% (monthly range 0-2.1%) of patients prepolicy and 11.6% (monthly range 8.3-15.4%) of patients postpolicy. Levonorgestrel intrauterine devices (IUDs) were used by 56.5%, implants by 29.1%, and copper IUDs by 14.5% of LARC users. Characteristics associated with LARC use included younger age, public insurance, non-White race, Hispanic or Latina ethnicity, higher body mass index, sexually transmitted infection in pregnancy, and tobacco use. Long-acting reversible contraceptive users had a lower rate of repeat pregnancy at 12 months postpartum compared with the non-LARC group (1.9% vs 3.6%, P<.001). CONCLUSION: Immediate postpartum LARC use increased after a state policy change mandated universal access and was associated with decreased pregnancy rates in the first year postdelivery.

Long-acting reversible contraceptive use, active component service women, U.S. Armed Forces, 2016-2020.

Long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) are highly effective means of birth control that can improve service women's overall health and readiness. This report expands upon prior data and summarizes the annual prevalence (overall and by demographics) of LARC use from 2016 through 2020 among active component U.S. service women, compares LARC prevalence to the prevalence of short-acting reversible contraceptives (SARCs), and evaluates the probability of continued use of LARCs by type. LARC use increased from 21.9% to 23.9% from 2016 through 2019 while SARC use decreased from 28.3% to 24.9%. Both SARC and LARC use decreased in 2020 which may have been related to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The prevalence of intrauterine devices (IUDs) was greater than implants, and IUDs also had a higher probability of continuation than implants. At 12 months, the continuation for IUDs was 81% compared to 73% for implants. At 24 months, the probabilities of continuation were 70% for IUDs and 54% for implants. Probabilities of continuation were similar across outsourced care and direct care settings. The increased use of LARCs along with their high frequency of continuation in U.S. service women may have a positive impact on overall health and readiness.

Role of social network in decision making for increasing uptake and continuing use of long acting reversible (LARC) methods in Pakistan.

INTRODUCTION: Despite evidence from recent Demographic Health Surveys that show 98% of the adult Pakistani population have an awareness of at least one modern contraceptive method, only 25% of married couples in Pakistan used a modern method of contraception. Of the modern contraceptive methods, LARC usage has increased only from 2.1 to 3%. This low uptake is puzzling in the context of high awareness of LARC methods and its availability through public sector facilities at subsidized costs. This study aimed to understand the social influences in initiating and continuing use of an LARC methods for contraception in a rural setting in Pakistan. METHODS: In-depth interviews were conducted with 27 women who were using a LARC method for contraception. Data was managed using NVivo 12 and themes were identified using a content analysis approach to analyze the transcripts. RESULTS: Four key themes, supported by sub-themes relating to a temporal model, were identified to explain women's experiences with initiating and continuing use of a LARC. The themes were (i) Use of trusted networks for information on LARCs; (ii) Personal motivation and family support in decision to use LARC; (iii) Choice of LARC methods and access to providers; and (iv) Social and professional support instrumental in long term use of LARC. Results highlight the significant role of immediate social network of female family members in supporting the women in initiating LARCs and maintaining the method's use. CONCLUSION: This study contributes to an in depth understanding of the decision-making process of women who adopted LARC and maintained its use. Women who proceeded to use an LARC and who persisted with its use despite the experience of side effects and social pressures, were able to do so with support from other female family members and spouse.

Increasing uptake of long-acting reversible contraception with structured contraceptive counselling: cluster randomised controlled trial (the LOWE trial).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of structured contraceptive counselling on the uptake of long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) and pregnancy rates. DESIGN: Cluster randomised trial. SETTING: Abortion, youth and maternal health clinics in Stockholm, Sweden. POPULATION: Sexually active women aged ≥18 years without a wish for pregnancy seeking abortion and/or contraceptive counselling. METHODS: For participants in clinics randomised to intervention, trained healthcare providers implemented a study-specific intervention package designed for structured contraceptive counselling. Participants in the control clinics received routine counselling. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was choice of LARCs at first visit. Secondary outcomes were LARC initiation at 3 months and pregnancy rates at 3 and 12 months. We used logistic mixed-effects models with random intercept for clinic to account for clustering. RESULTS: From September 2017 to May 2019, 28 randomised clinics enrolled 1364 participants. Analyses including 1338 subjects showed that more participants in the intervention group compared with the control group chose LARCs: 267/658 (40.6%) versus 206/680 (30.3%) (OR 2.77, 95% CI 1.99-3.86). LARC initiation was higher in the intervention group compared with the control group: 213/528 (40.3%) versus 153/531 (28.8%) (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.22-2.49). At the abortion clinics, the pregnancy rate was significantly lower at 12 months in the intervention group compared with the control group: 13/101 (12.9%) versus 28/103 (27.2%) (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.18-0.88). CONCLUSIONS: Structured contraceptive counselling increased LARC uptake in all clinics and significantly reduced unintended pregnancy rates in abortion clinics at the 12 months follow-up. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Structured contraceptive counselling increased LARC uptake and reduced pregnancy rates at 12 months.

Demand satisfied by modern contraceptive among married women of reproductive age in Kenya.

BACKGROUND: Demand for family planning met/satisfied with modern contraceptive methods (mDFPS) has been proposed to track progress in Family Planning (FP) programs for Sustainable Development Goals. This study measured mDFPS among married women of reproductive age (MWRA) in Kenya to identify which groups were not being reached by FP programs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Performance, Monitoring and Accountability 2020 (PMA2020) survey data from 2014-2018 was used. PMA2020 surveys are cross-sectional including women 15-49 years. PMA2020 used a 2-stage cluster design with urban/rural regions as strata with random selection of households. Univariate and multivariate analysis was done using stata V15. RESULTS: Of the 34,832 respondents interviewed from 2014 to 2018, 60.2% were MWRA. There was a significant decrease in demand for FP from 2014 to 2018, p = 0.012. Lowest demand was among 15-19 and 45-49 years old women. Overall, modern contraceptive prevalence rate increased significantly from 54.6% to 60.8%, p = 0.004, being higher for women from urban areas, home visits by health care worker (HCW), educated, wealthy, visited health facilities and exposed to mass media. Unmet need for FP decreased from 23.0-13.8% over the 5-years, p<0.001. Married adolescent 15-19 had the highest unmet need and those from rural areas, poor, uneducated and not exposed to mass media. mDFPS increased significantly from 69.7-79.4% over the 5-years, p<0.001, with increase in long acting reversible contraception/permanent methods from 19.9-37.2% and decrease in short acting methods from 49.9-42.2%. Significant determinants of mDFPS were age, rural/urban residence, education, wealth, health facility visitation, exposure to FP messages via mass media in the last 12 months, year of study and county of residence. CONCLUSIONS: Results show a good progress in key FP indicators. However, not all MWRA are being reached and should be reached if Kenya is to achieve the desired universal health coverage as well as Sustainable Development Goals. Targeted home visits by HCW as well increase in mass media coverage could be viable interventions.

The significant influence of history of induced abortion on the utilisation of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods in the immediate post abortion period, Northern Ethiopia.

BACKGROUND: Rapid population growth, untended pregnancy, and related consequences remain the concern of Sub-Saharan African countries, including Ethiopia. Despite this, long-acting reversible contraceptives methods are still underutilised and no studies have sought the factors in this study setting. Therefore, this study conducted to assess the prevalence and determining factors of long-acting reversible contraceptives utilisation following an abortion in Northern Ethiopia. METHOD: Facility-based cross-sectional study design was employed. A total of340 post aborted women selected by a systematic sampling method from August 1 to October 30, 2018. Data were entered into Epi-Info version 7 software and exported to SPSS version 20 for analysis. Both bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with the outcome variable. RESULTS: The overall post-abortion long-acting reversible contraceptives utilisation was 57(16.76%) with 47(82.46%) implantand 10 (17.54%) intrauterine devices. Age range 20-29 years (AOR = 0.09, 95% CI 0.02-0.37), employed (AOR = 5.22, 95% CI 1.99-13.67), had ≥2 alive children (AOR = 7.02, 95% CI 1.58-31.23), induced abortion (AOR = 8.41, 95% CI 3.28-21.59), surgical abortion (AOR = 5.99, 95% CI 2.25-15.94), previous awareness (AOR = 3.18, 95% CI 1.14-8.82) and history of prior utilisation (AOR = 3.59, 95% CI 1.08-11.97) were the factors significantly associated with utilisation of post-abortion long-acting reversible contraceptives. CONCLUSION: Long-acting reversible contraceptive methods level of utilisation following an abortion in this study was low. Advocating and raising awareness should always consider on benefits and effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraceptives for all type of abortion and methods of termination as an integral part of reproductive health care services.

Sex and female empowerment (SAFE): A randomized trial comparing sexual health interventions for women in treatment for opioid use disorder.

BACKGROUND: Unintended pregnancies are prevalent among women with opioid use disorder (OUD). The Sex and Female Empowerment (SAFE) project developed a social-cognitive, theory-driven intervention to increase acceptance of and adherence to contraceptive practices among women receiving medication for OUD (MOUD). This study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of two SAFE interventions (Face-to-face and Computer-adapted) compared to usual care as well as their efficacy to improve contraception utilization. METHODS: This pilot randomized trial enrolled 90 heterosexual, non-pregnant, reproductive-age women receiving MOUD. Participants were randomized into either a: SAFE Face-to-face intervention, SAFE Computer-adapted intervention, or usual care (UC) condition (n = 30 each) and followed for 6 months. Outcome measures included intervention completion, intervention satisfaction, attendance at a contraception consultation appointment, and long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) method receipt. A generalized linear model was used for inferential testing and to estimate least squares means (predicted probabilities for binary outcomes) and their standard errors. RESULTS: Compared to the UC condition, both the SAFE Face-to-face and the SAFE Computer-adapted intervention had higher intervention completion [Means (Standard Errors) = 0.97 (.03) and 0.97 (.03), respectively, vs. 0.53 (.09); ps<.001], higher intervention satisfaction [Ms (SEs) = 3.7 (.11) and 3.8 (.11), respectively, vs. 3.1 (.11); ps<0.001), higher contraception consultation visit attendance [Ms(SEs) = 0.80 (.07) and 0.73 (.08) vs. 0.33 (.09); p < .001], and greater LARC receipt [Ms(SEs) = 0.77 (.08) and 0.73 (.08) vs. 0.23 (.08); p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: SAFE appears feasible and efficacious for supporting women in contraception decision-making. Integrating SAFE into women's comprehensive OUD treatment services holds promise to increase contraceptive decision-making and initiation of a chosen method.

Facilitators and Barriers to Implementation of Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Services for Adolescent Girls and Young Women in Gaborone, Botswana.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Botswana has a high pregnancy rate among adolescent girls and young women (AGYW). Long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) use among AGYW in Botswana is low, despite its high effectiveness for preventing pregnancy. Using an implementation science framework, we assessed barriers and facilitators to LARC implementation among AGYW in Botswana. DESIGN: Cross-sectional mixed methods. SETTING: Gaborone, Botswana. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty sexually active AGYW ages 18-24 years; 20 health system stakeholders. INTERVENTIONS: Surveys and semistructured interviews grounded in the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Themes reflecting barriers and facilitators of LARC implementation. RESULTS: The median age for AGYW was 22 (interquartile range, 21-23) years. Twenty percent were using an implant and none had ever used an intrauterine device. Barriers and facilitators of LARC implementation spanned factors at each Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research domain: (1) LARC characteristics like side effects; (2) the clinics' inner settings, including availability of youth-friendly services; (3) characteristics of health system stakeholders, such as LARC skills, and AGYW experiences, attitudes, and beliefs about LARCs; (4) the outer setting external to clinics and Botswana's health system including reproductive health law and policy for minor adolescents; and (5) the implementation process level such as the availability of free or low-cost LARCs. CONCLUSION: We identified multilevel, context-specific factors that affect LARC implementation. Our findings can inform the development of interventions to increase LARC implementation in Botswana by addressing intersecting factors across patient, clinic, health system, and sociopolitical levels, such as providing confidential services to minors and improving LARC training and supply chain pipelines.

Impact of perceived contraceptive policy changes on long acting reversible contraception dispensing trends.

OBJECTIVE: We observed the long-term trend of Long Acting Reversible Contraception (LARC) usage before and after the 2016 presidential election. METHODS: We observed the rate of LARC dispensed at a university student health centre in the 18 months preceding and 27 months following the 2016 U.S. presidential election which posed threat to contraception access. We applied a segmented regression model using two linear regression line segments to evaluate whether there is a time point where the trend of LARC dispensing changed. We fit the regression models with a breakpoint at month 0 (election month) and 3 months with a Locally Estimated Scatterplot Smoothing (LOESS) estimate with parameters obtained by estimating simple linear regression models separately below and above the breakpoint '0'. RESULTS: There were a total of 2067 LARC methods dispensed from May 2015 to February 2019. The average number of LARC methods dispensed before November 2016 was 38/month and increased to 51/month post-presidential election. The LARC dispense rate significantly increased each month (0.38, 1.74; 95% confidence level, p < 0.05) until a breakpoint at 6 months (standard error 4.11) post-election followed by slower decrease (-0.59/month, 95% confidence level: -1.37, 0.20; p=not significant). CONCLUSION: Our study is the first to report long-term trends (27 months post-election) in LARC uptake amidst the public discourse that suggested the end of a policy that provided LARC insurance coverage. Although this observational study cannot suggest causality, the findings could reflect actions taken to prevent unintended pregnancy in response to the event of uncertain national policy.

Cost sharing, postpartum contraceptive use, and short interpregnancy interval rates among commercially insured women.

BACKGROUND: Increasing access to effective birth control after childbirth may meet many women's preferences and reduce short interpregnancy interval rates. Eliminating out-of-pocket costs for contraception has been reported to increase the use of the most effective methods among women with employer-based insurance, but the prevalence and effects of patient cost sharing for contraception have not been studied during the postpartum period. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the association between cost sharing for long-acting reversible contraception and postpartum contraception use patterns and pregnancies in the 12 months after delivery. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of commercially insured women undergoing childbirth from 2014 to 2018 using Optum's (Eden Prairie, MN) de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart database. This large national database includes nonretired employees and their dependents who are enrolled in health insurance plans sponsored by large- or medium-sized US-based employers. Women with 12 months of continuous enrollment postpartum were included. Childbirth, pregnancy, and contraceptive method (female sterilization, long-acting reversible contraceptives, other hormonal methods, and no prescription method observed) were identified using claims data. Contraceptive use patterns were observed at 3, 6, and 12 months postpartum and adjusted for individual and plan characteristics. Median out-of-pocket costs were $0 for sterilization and other hormonal methods but nonzero for long-acting reversible contraception. We therefore used simple and multivariable logistic regressions to examine the association between plan-level cost sharing (no cost sharing, $0; low cost sharing, >$0-<$200; and high cost sharing, ≥$200 out-of-pocket cost) for any long-acting reversible contraceptive insertion and contraceptive use patterns and short interpregnancy interval rates, controlling for age, household income, race and ethnicity, region, and insurance plan type. RESULTS: Among 25,298 plans with cost sharing data, we identified 172,941 women with continuous enrollment for 12 months postpartum, including 82,500 (47.7%) in no cost sharing, 22,595 (13.1%) in low cost sharing, and 67,846 (39.2%) in high cost sharing plans. The percentage of postpartum women in the study sample using any prescription contraceptive method was 39.5% by 3 months, 43.8% by 6 months, and 46.0% by 12 months. At all time points, postpartum women in no cost sharing plans had a higher predicted probability of long-acting reversible contraceptive use (eg, at 12 months: no cost sharing, 22.0%; low cost-sharing, 17.5%; high cost sharing, 18.3%; P<.001) and a lower predicted probability of no prescription method use (eg, at 12 months: no cost sharing, 51.8%; low cost sharing, 55.0%; high cost sharing, 54.9%; P<.001) than those in low or high cost sharing plans. Predicted probabilities of female sterilization and other hormonal method use did not differ substantively by plan cost sharing for long-acting reversible contraception at any time point. The proportion of women experiencing a short interpregnancy interval was low (1.9% by 3 months, 1.9% by 6 months, 2.0% by 12 months) and did not differ by plan cost sharing for long-acting reversible contraception at any time point. CONCLUSION: Out-of-pocket costs for long-acting reversible contraception influence the method of contraception used by postpartum women with employer-based insurance. Eliminating financial barriers to long-acting reversible contraception access after childbirth may help women initiate their preferred method and increase the use of long-acting reversible contraceptives among interested women who otherwise might utilize less effective methods.

Contraceptive usage in homeless women accessing a dedicated primary care service in Scotland, UK: a case note review.

BACKGROUND: Of the 70 000 people experiencing homelessness in Scotland, at least 40% are women. Little is known about their contraceptive usage. Most pregnancies in homelessness are unintended and children are usually looked after in the care system. METHODS: A case note review of women's current contraceptive usage in a primary care service serving women experiencing homelessness in Edinburgh, Scotland. The service electronic database was searched for keywords relating to contraception to determine current usage, but also reproductive health, wider demographics and previous pregnancies. RESULTS: Of 174 women (16-55 years), 75 (43%) were recorded as using a contraceptive method. 49 (28%) were using long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), most of which was the contraceptive implant. However, 6/41 (15%) of the most effective LARC (intrauterine contraception and implant) was being used beyond its' expiry date. 34 (20%) had no mention of contraceptive use in their medical record and 32 (19%) were not using contraception despite being sexually active. 6 (3%) had been hysterectomised/female sterilisation. 26 (15%) were not sexually active. 179 of the 233 (77%) children mentioned in women's electronic records were recorded as being looked after out with their care. 138/174 (79%) had current/previous drug or alcohol misuse. 100/174 (57%) had a history of domestic violence or abuse. 22/174 (13%) were involved/had been involved in sex work. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care services need to give greater attention to the contraceptive needs of homeless women to empower them to become pregnant when the time is right for them and prevent the consequences of unintended pregnancy and homelessness.

Integration of family planning services into health care for HIV-positive women in Botswana.

OBJECTIVE: To create and assess a clinic model to address the unmet need for effective contraception among women living with HIV in Botswana, where half of all pregnancies are unintended and 30% of women of reproductive age are living with HIV. METHODS: We introduced family planning services into an HIV clinic in Gaborone, Botswana. Our intervention gave HIV providers brief training on contraceptive counseling plus the option of immediate referral of interested patients to an on-site contraception provider. We administered a survey to patients and providers before and after intervention. Patients were female, aged 18-45 years and using antiretrovirals. RESULTS: At baseline, 6% of 141 patients discussed contraception with their HIV-care provider, compared with 61% of 107 post intervention (P < 0.001). At baseline, 6% of patients reported wanting to use long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). Post intervention, 45% of patients chose to meet with the contraception provider, and 29% wanted to use LARC (P < 0.001 versus baseline). All providers strongly agreed that they were better informed about contraception post intervention and were satisfied with their ability to counsel and refer women for contraception. CONCLUSIONS: Provision of on-site contraceptive services in this HIV clinic encouraged family planning discussions and increased interest in LARC.

Current evidence of contraceptive uptake, pregnancy and continuation rates in young women: a systematic review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Half of all pregnancies worldwide are unintended, and the rate is even higher in women aged ≤25 years. We sought to identify which method of contraception was the most effective option to prevent unintended pregnancy in young women and adolescents. METHODS: Systematic searches, without language restrictions, were carried out of the PubMed, Embase, Lilacs and Cochrane databases from inception to July 2020. Abstracts and full-text articles of observational studies and randomised controlled trials comparing the use of multiple methods of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) and short-acting reversible contraception (SARC) in young women and adolescents were screened and reviewed. Risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences with their 95% confidence interval (CI) were derived using a random-effects meta-analytical model. Meta-analyses provided pooled estimates for adverse events, continuation rates and efficacy of LARC methods in young women and adolescents. Nine of the 25 included studies compared LARC with SARC, and 16 compared LARC methods only. RESULTS: At 12 months, young women had better adherence with LARC compared with SARC (n = 1606; RR 1.60; 95% CI 1.21, 2.12; I 2 = 88%), which suggests a better unintended pregnancy prevention outcome for young women. However, more young women chose SARC (n = 2835; RR 0.37; 95% CI 0.17, 0.80; I 2 = 99%). Pregnancy during LARC use was rare. CONCLUSION: LARC methods are the most efficacious in preventing pregnancy, and women should be informed of this if pregnancy prevention is their priority. The evidence, however, is of low quality. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017055452.

Use of long-acting reversible contraception among adolescents and young women in Kenya.

The Kenya Demographic and Health Survey (KDHS 2014) revealed changing patterns in the contraceptive use of young women aged 15-24, shifting from injectable methods to implants. Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) is user friendly, long-term, and more effective than other modern methods. It could be a game-changer in dealing with unintended pregnancies and herald a new chapter in the reproductive health and rights of young women. This study determined the factors associated with LARC use among adolescent girls and young women to expand the evidence of its potential as the most effective method of reducing unwanted pregnancies among the cohort. This study analysed secondary data from KDHS 2014 using binary logistic regression. The findings showed a rise in LARC use (18%), with identified predictors of reduced odds being aged 15-19 [OR = 0.735, 95% CI = 0.549-0.984], residence (rural) [OR = 0.674, CI = 0.525-0.865], religion (Protestant/other Christian) [OR = 0.377, CI = 0.168-0.842], married, [OR = 0.746, CI = 0.592-0.940], and region (high contraception) [OR = 0.773, CI = 0.626-0.955], while the number of living children showed increased odds for 1-2 children [OR = 17.624, CI = 9.482-32.756] and 3+ children [OR = 23.531, CI = 11.751-47.119]. This study established the rising popularity of LARC and identified factors that can be addressed to promote it. Its increased uptake could help Kenya achieve the International Conference on Population and Development 25's first and second commitments on teenage pregnancies and maternal and new-born health, thus promoting the health, wellbeing, educational goals, and rights of this critical cohort. This study can guide the accelerated efforts needed in Kenya's march towards the five zeros of unmet need for contraception, teenage pregnancies, unsafe abortions, preventable maternal deaths, and preventable neonatal/infant deaths.

Young Women's Complex Patterns of Contraceptive Use: Findings from an Australian Cohort Study.

CONTEXT: Unintended pregnancy is common among young women. Understanding how such women use contraceptives- including method combinations-is essential to providing high-quality contraceptive care. METHODS: Data were from a representative cohort of 2,965 Australian women aged 18-23 who participated in the 2012-2013 Contraceptive Use, Pregnancy Intention and Decisions baseline survey, had been heterosexually active in the previous six months, and were not pregnant or trying to conceive. Latent class analysis was employed to characterize women's contraceptive choices; multinomial logistic regression was used to evaluate correlates of membership in the identified classes. RESULTS: The vast majority of women (96%) reported using one or more contraceptives, most commonly short-acting hormonal methods (60%), barrier methods (38%), long-acting contraceptives (16%) and withdrawal (15%). In total, 32 combinations were reported. Four latent classes of method use were identified: no contraception (4% of women); short-acting hormonal methods with supplementation (59%, mostly the pill); high-efficacy contraceptives with supplementation (15%, all long-acting reversible contraceptive users); and low-efficacy contraceptive combinations (21%); supplementation usually involved barrier methods or withdrawal. Class membership differed according to women's characteristics; for example, women who had ever been pregnant were more likely than other women to be in the no-contraception, high-efficacy contraceptive or low-efficacy contraceptive combination classes than in the short-acting hormonal contraceptive class (odds ratios, 2.0-3.0). CONCLUSIONS: The complexity of women's contraceptive choices and the associations between latent classes and such characteristics as pregnancy history highlight the need for individualized approaches to pregnancy prevention and contraceptive care.

Examining the pace of change in contraceptive practices in abortion services - a follow-up case study of a quality improvement collaborative.

BACKGROUND: Among all women who experienced an abortion in Sweden 2017, 45% had previously underwent at least one abortion. This phenomenon of increasing rates of repeat abortions stimulated efforts to improve contraceptive services through a Quality Improvement Collaborative (QIC) with user involvement. The participating teams had difficulty in coordinating access post-abortion to the most effective contraception, Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), during the eight-month QIC. This prompted questions about the pace of change in contraceptive services post-abortion. The aim of the study is to evaluate the evolution and impact of QIC changes regarding patient outcomes, system performance and professional development over 12 months after a QIC designed to enhance contraceptive services in the context of abortion. METHODS: This follow-up case study involves three multi-professional teams from abortion services at three hospitals in Sweden, which participated in a QIC during 2017. We integrated qualitative data on the evolution of changes and quantitative data regarding the monthly proportion of women initiating LARC, analysed in statistical control charts from before the QIC up until 12 months after its conclusion. RESULTS: Teams A and B increased the average proportion of women who initiated LARC within 30 days post abortion in the 12 months after the QIC; Team A 16-25%; Team B 20-34%. Team C achieved more than 50% in individual months but not consistently in the Post-QIC period. Elusive during the QIC, they now could offer timely appointments for women to initiate LARC more frequently. Team members reported continued focus on how to create trustful relationships when counseling women. They described improved teamwork, leadership support and impact on organizing appointments for initiating LARC following the QIC. CONCLUSIONS: QIC teams further improved women's timely access to LARC post abortion through continued changes in services 12 months after the QIC, demonstrating that the 8-month QIC was too short for all changes to materialize. Teams simultaneously improved women's reproductive health, health services, and professional development.

Determinants of long acting reversible contraception utilization in Northwest Ethiopia: An institution-based case control study.

BACKGROUND: Though long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) are highly effective, have minimal side effects, require minimal follow-up, and are low cost, only 10% of contraceptives used in Ethiopia are LARCs. The reason for this low uptake is not understood at the country or regional level. Therefore, this study identified determinants of LARC utilization in Northwest Ethiopia. METHODS: A facility-based unmatched case control study, using LARC users as cases and short- acting reversible contraception (SARC) users as controls, had been conducted at fourteen public health institutions in Northwest Ethiopia. A systematic random sampling technique was used to select participants with a 1:2 case to control ratio (n = 1167). Binary logistic regression analysis was used to identify determinants of LARC utilization among family planning service users. RESULTS: Wealth status [AOR:1.87, 95%CI (1.08, 3.24)], history of abortion [AOR:2.69, 95%CI (1.41, 5.12)], limiting family size [AOR: 2.38, 95%CI (1.01, 5.62)], good knowledge about LARCs [AOR: 2.52, 95%CI (1.17, 5.41)], method convenience [AOR: 0.23, 95%CI (0.16, 0.34)], good availability of method [AOR:0.10 (0.05, 0.19)], less frequent visits to health facility [AOR:2.95, 95% CI(1.89, 4.62)], health care providers advice [AOR:10.69, 95%CI (3.27, 34.87)], partner approval [AOR:0.66, 95%CI (0.45, 0.97)], and favorable attitude towards LARCs [AOR:13.0, 95%CI (8.60, 19.72)] were significantly associated with LARC utilization. CONCLUSION: Professional support, favorable attitude towards LARC use, high economic status, history of abortion, advantage of less frequent visits, having good knowledge towards LARC and interest of limiting births were significantly associated with LARC Utilization. On the other hand, perceived method convenience, and contraception availability were inversely associated with it. Family planning education about the benefits of LARC should be done by health providers and media. Male involvement in the counselling and decision making about the advantage of using LARC may improve the negative influence of partners on LARC utilization. It is also recommended that, future qualitative research further explore perceptions of LARC use.